Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

CPP-ACP ÇÔÀ¯ Å©¸²°ú ºÒ¼Ò°¡ Ãʱâ Àΰø¿ì½Ä ¹ý¶ûÁú¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â À籤ȭ È¿°ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºñ±³ ¿¬±¸

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE REMINERALIZATION EFFECTS USING CPP-ACP AND FLUORIDE ON THE ARTIFICIAL ENAMEL LESION

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 2009³â 36±Ç 1È£ p.38 ~ 45
±è±â¹é, ¾ç±ÔÈ£, ÃÖ³²±â, ±è¼±¹Ì,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è±â¹é ( Kim Ki-Beak ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç, Ä¡ÀÇÇבּ¸¼Ò
¾ç±ÔÈ£ ( Yang Kyu-Ho ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
ÃÖ³²±â ( Choi Nam-Ki ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç, Ä¡ÀÇÇבּ¸¼Ò
±è¼±¹Ì ( Kim Seon-Mi ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç, Ä¡ÀÇÇבּ¸¼Ò

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸´Â »óÇ°È­µÈ 10% CPP-ACP Å©¸² (Tooth mousse, GC Co., Japan)ÀÌ 0.05 % NaF ºÒ¼Ò ¿ë¾× ¸ÅÀÏ ¾çÄ¡¹ýÀ» ´ëüÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´ÂÁö ¾Ë¾Æº¸±â À§ÇÏ¿©, Àΰø Żȸ º´¼Ò¸¦ °¡Áø ¿ìÄ¡ ¹ý¶ûÁú¿¡ ´ëÇØ 10ÀÏ°£ À§ µÎ °¡Áö ¹æ¹ý ´Üµ¶ ȤÀº º¹ÇÕ »ç¿ëÀÇ À籤ȭ È¿°ú¸¦ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 0.1% thymol ¿ë¾×¿¡ ³ÃÀå º¸°üÇÑ ¼ÒÀÇ Ä¡¾Æ¸¦ ±³Á¤¿ë ·¹Áø (Orthodotic resin, Dentsply international Inc., USA)¿¡¸Å¸ôÇÑ ÈÄ Å»È¸ ¿ë¾×¿¡ 96½Ã°£ º¸°üÇÏ¿´°í, ÃÑ 60°³ÀÇ ½ÃÆíÀ» 5°³ÀÇ ±ºÀ¸·Î ³ª´©¾ú´Ù; ºñóġ±º (1±º), 0.05% NaF ¿ë¾× 1ºÐ (2±º), Tooth mousse 3ºÐ (3±º), 0.05% NaF ¿ë¾× 1ºÐ ó¸® ÈÄ Tooth mousse 3ºÐ (4±º), Tooth mousse 3ºÐ ó¸® ÈÄ 0.05% NaF ¿ë¾× 1ºÐ(5±º). À籤ȭ Á¤µµ´Â 10ÀÏ°£ÀÇ ½ÃÆí ó¸® Àü ÈÄÀÇ Vickers hardness number¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿© ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¿¬±¸ °á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù. 1. °¢ ±º¿¡¼­ ½ÃÆí ó¸® ÀüÈÄÀÇ Ç¥¸é°æµµ¸¦ paired t-test¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ºñ±³ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú, 3, 4, 5 ±º¿¡¼­¸¸ À¯ÀÇÇÒ¸¸ÇÑ Ç¥¸é °æµµ Áõ°¡°¡ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù(P < 0.05). 2. °¢ ±ºº°·Î Æò±Õ Ç¥¸é °æµµ Áõ°¡·®Àº 5 > 4 > 3 > 2 > 1 ±º ¼øÀ̾ú°í, °¢ ±ºÀÇ Ç¥¸é°æµµ Áõ°¡·®À» one-way ANOVA test·Î ºñ±³ºÐ¼®ÇÑ ÈÄ Duncan test·Î »çÈÄ °ËÁ¤ÇÑ °á°ú, 4, 5 ±ºÀº 1, 2, 3 ±º°ú À¯ÀÇÇÒ¸¸ÇÑ Ç¥¸é°æµµ Áõ°¡¸¦ º¸¿´À¸¸ç (P < 0.05), ´Ù¸¥ ±ºµé °£¿¡´Â À¯ÀÇÇÒ¸¸ÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. 3. Tooth mousse¸¦ ¿ìÄ¡¿¡ 10ÀÏ°£ Àû¿ë½ÃŲ °á°ú 0.05% NaF ¿ë¾×º¸´Ù ´õ ¸¹Àº Ç¥¸é°æµµ º¯È­·®À» ³ªÅ¸³ÂÁö¸¸, Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÒ¸¸ÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú¿¡¼­ Tooth mousse »ç¿ëÀº ºÒ¼Ò ¾çÄ¡°¡ ¿ëÀÌÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀº ȯÀڵ鿡°Ô ¾çÈ£ÇÑ ´ëü ¹æ¾ÈÀÌ µÉ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÇ¸ç, ¶ÇÇÑ ºÒ¼Ò Àû¿ë½Ã Tooth mousse¸¦ º¹ÇÕ »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ÃßõµÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸®¶ó »ç·áµÈ´Ù.

The aim of this study was to examine efficacy of the commercially available 10% CPP-ACP cream (Tooth mousse, GC Co., Japan) and/or 0.05% NaF solution on the remineralization of artifical caries-like lesion in the bovine teeth enamel. Sixty bovine teeth were embedded in orthodontic resin and flattened. The enamel surface in 3 mm diameter was exposed with nail varnish. Specimens were stored in demineralizing solution and divided 5 groups; Group 1 (No treatment), 2 (0.05% NaF solution 1 min), 3 (Tooth mousse 3 min), 4 (After 0.05% NaF solution, Tooth mousse treatment), and 5 (After Tooth mousse treatment, soaking in 0.05% NaF solution during 1 min). After treatment by groups, all specimens was stored in artificial saliva for 30 min. After the process described as above was performed during 10 days without pH cycling, surface hardness (Vickers Hardness Number, VHN) was tested and analyzed by paired t-test and one-way ANOVA test with SPSS 14.0. In intragroup comparison between surface hardness of pre and post-treatment, group 3, 4, 5 showed statistically significant increase (P < 0.05). In intergroup comparison among surface hardness increase of all groups, difference of group 5 between pre and post-treatment () was the highest, and followed by group 4 (), 3 (), 2 (), 1 (). Tooth mousse can be a good alternative agent for the fluoride, and the combination use with fluoride might have the additional anticariogenic effect.

Å°¿öµå

ºÒÈ­ ³ªÆ®·ý; À籤ȭ
Tooth mousse; Sodium fluoride; Remineralization

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI